We integrate field and quantitative approaches to understand the social and ecological drivers of risk and resilience in fisheries.
Combining empirical and theoretical approaches is a powerful way to tackle questions in basic and applied ecology. Our work sits at the interface of quantitative ecology, population dynamics, life-history theory, risk assessment, spatial ecology, human dimensions, and environmental policy.
We work alongside Indigenous partners and government researchers to produce evidence that bridges science and policy, supporting management frameworks that advance reconciliation, respect Indigenous sovereignty, and promote resilient ecosystems.
Fishery resilience emerges from behavioural feedbacks between fish, people, and management. Adapted from Ward et al. (2016).
Assessing the status of salmon populations and testing which management actions actually rebuild them, with Central Coast and West Coast Nations.
Weaving Kitasoo Xai'xais knowledge and Western science to restore Pacific herring spawning areas in Kitasu Bay.
Movement, habitat use, and the status of marine invertebrate fisheries: the highest-value fisheries in Pacific Canada and the least assessed.
How rockfish life histories shift across space and time, and whether marine protected areas deliver the recoveries they are designed for.
Local processes are nonlinear and patchy; aggregate dynamics are not their average. We study what happens in between these scales, and what risks arise from ignoring it.
Building compensation from first principles (life history, plasticity and density dependence) to ask where sustainable harvest actually comes from.
Reference points encode values, not just biology. We work on assessment frameworks that serve co-governance rather than talking past it.
Growth records from 1,100 lake trout across 30 lakes, and a social-ecological halo of depletion around the most accessible ones.